MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982098436 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.40.3.895

INDICATIONS OF INTERMEDIATE COMPOSITIONS IN THE BaSO4-SrSO4 SOLID-SOLUTION SERIES FROM THE BAHCECIKTEPE CELESTINE DEPOSIT, SIVAS, EAST-CENTRAL ANATOLIA, TURKEY

2002· article· en· W1982098436 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erdoğan Tekin, Baki Varol, I. Sönmez Sayili, Y. Elerman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryFaciesEvaporiteMineralization (soil science)Clastic rockMineralogyElectron microprobeSedimentary rockDiagenesisStructural basinPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various types of celestine occurrences are hosted by Tertiary evaporite deposits and molasse-type sediments of the Sivas Basin, in east-central Anatolia, Turkey. Celestine mineralization occurs in various sedimentary facies, including clastic, carbonaceous and evaporitic. Mineralization in the Ba–Sr sulfate solid-solution series is found in a few samples from the Bahceciktepe celestine deposit, one of the typical mineralized sites in the Basin. Samples with a dendritic structure have karstic dissolution-induced voids and usually show a travertine-like texture; some are crystallized in fibroradial and subhedral tabular forms. In addition, clay envelopes around crystals and compositional and sector zoning of the crystals are typical features. XRD, electron-microprobe, single-crystal XRD and AAS analyses of the same samples suggest the presence of intermediate compositions in the BaSO4–SrSO4 solid-solution series, as well as compositions close to the end members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207