Intravenous Cyclosporine‐Rifampin Interaction in a Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 10-year-old girl with chronic myelogenous leukemia began receiving cyclosporine the day before bone marrow transplant surgery Three days after the transplant, she developed fever and neutropenia due to a Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Despite treatment with various antibiotics, the patient's fever persisted over the next 4 days. Intravenous rifampin was added to her antibiotic regimen of piperacillin, tobramycin, cloxacillin, and amphotericin. On day 12, the patient's blood cultures were negative and her fever had resolved; rifampin was discontinued. On day 16, the patient engrafted; she subsequently developed a grade II graft-versus-host disease of the skin and gastrointestinal tract, which responded to methylprednisolone. Her cyclosporine blood levels, which had been subtherapeutic since day 5 despite increasing intravenous dosages, were within the therapeutic range on day 21, and she was discharged 12 days later. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of an intravenous cyclosporine-rifampin interaction that resulted in subtherapeutic cyclosporine concentrations in a child receiving a bone marrow transplant who subsequently developed acute graft-versus-host disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".