The Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein: forging the link between actin and cell activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) has emerged as a central player in the regulation of actin remodeling in T cells. The unique domain structure of WASp and other WASp family members enables these proteins to associate with a myriad of signaling effectors and to thereby regulate the coupling of T cell antigen receptor (TCR) engagement to both cytoskeletal rearrangement and transcriptional activation. This review focuses on these biochemical properties of WASp and also on the mechanisms whereby WASp interactions with its cognate ligands influence T cell activation. Because of its capacity to shift intracellular location and thereby dictate both the timing and the spatial distribution of actin polymerization following cell stimulation, WASp is well positioned to play major regulatory roles in directing a wide range of cellular processes and signaling pathways. Further dissection of the functional and biochemical properties of WASp therefore represents a promising avenue towards defining the molecular mechanisms that convey TCR stimulatory signals to the actin cytoskeleton and integrate cytoskeletal and other signaling systems so as to evoke a biological response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".