MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982134396 · doi:10.1002/bit.20876

Transient performance of two‐phase partitioning bioreactors treating a toluene contaminated gas stream

2006· article· en· W1982134396 on OpenAlexaff
Neal G. Boudreau, Andrew J. Daugulis

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Bioengineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAqueous solutionBioreactorHexadecaneChemistryTolueneAqueous two-phase systemPhase (matter)ChromatographyVolatile organic compoundVolume (thermodynamics)Chemical engineeringOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-phase partitioning bioreactors (TPPBs) consist of a cell-containing aqueous phase and an immiscible organic phase that sequesters and delivers toxic substrates to cells based on equilibrium partitioning. The immiscible organic phase, which acts as a buffer for inhibitory substrate loadings, makes it possible for TPPBs to handle high volatile organic compound (VOC) loadings, and in this study the performance of liquid n-hexadecane and solid styrene butadiene (SB) polymer beads used as partitioning phases were compared to a single aqueous phase system while treating transient loadings of a toluene contaminated air stream by Achromobacter xylosoxidans Y234. The TPPBs operated as well-mixed stirred tanks, with total working volumes of 3 L (3 L aqueous for the single-phase system, 2 L aqueous and 1 L n-hexadecane for the solvent system, and 2.518 L aqueous volume and 500 g of SB beads for the polymer system). Two 60-min step changes (7 and 17 times the nominal loading rates, termed "small" and "large" steps, respectively) were imposed on the systems and the performance was characterized by the overall removal efficiencies, instantaneous removal efficiency recovery times (above 95% removal), and dissolved oxygen recovery times. For the small steps, with a nominal loading of 343 g/m3/h increasing to 2,400 g/m3/h, the TPPB system using n-hexadecane as the second phase performed best, removing 97% of the toluene fed to the system compared with 90% for the polymer beads system and only 69% for the single-phase system. The imposed large transient gave similar results, although the impact of the presence of a second sequestering phase was more pronounced, with the n-hexadecane system maintaining much reduced aqueous toluene concentrations leading to significantly improved performance. This investigation also showed that the presence of both n-hexadecane and SB beads improved the oxygen transfer within the systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology and BioengineeringSame topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207