A phase II study of homoharringtonine for the treatment of children with refractory or recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia: A pediatric oncology group study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Homoharringtonine (HHT) is a plant alkaloid that is derived from a Chinese evergreen tree. Its mechanism of action is thought to be by inhibition of protein, DNA, and RNA synthesis by inhibition of chain initiation. The treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in children, has been hampered by few new effective agents developed in the past 30 years. Significant numbers of children still die of this disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of HHT for the therapy of refractory AML in children. PROCEDURE: Patients entered the study and were treated with HHT 7mg/m(2)/day for 10 days. The cycles could be repeated every 21 days depending on recovery from myelosuppression. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients entered the study, with twenty-eight evaluable for response. Complete response was obtained in four and a partial response in one (response rate 5/28 = 18%). Significant toxicities included prolonged severe myelosuppression in all responsive patients and neuropathogenic pain in two patients. The median duration of response was 62 days with a range of 28-126 days. CONCLUSIONS: HHT has activity against chemotherapy resistant AML in children, with tolerable toxicity. This agent warrants further clinical evaluation in combination with other agents or perhaps biologic response modifiers which will hopefully lead to useful therapeutic options. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;37:103-107.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".