MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982197591 · doi:10.3727/000000006783982142

Comparison of Cooling Systems during Islet Purification

2006· article· en· W1982197591 on OpenAlex
S. M. Swift, Tatsuya Kin, Mohammadreza Mirbolooki, Richard Wilson, Jonathan R.T. Lakey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Transplantation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCapital District Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoolantWater coolingChillerIsletCentrifugationChemistryChromatographyMaterials scienceThermodynamicsBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Islet isolation is a complex procedure that includes digestion and purification of pancreatic tissue. As we move towards clinical regulatory control and standardization, understanding of the detailed stages of the procedure have become increasingly important. Purification on a COBE 2991 density gradient allows human islets to be separated from a large volume of acinar tissue. Cooling the gradient and tissue is thought to be important to reduce metabolic activity but cooling systems for the gradient are expensive, with limited availability. In this study, the efficiency of cooling methods for the COBE 2991 cell separator has been investigated. The two cooling systems were: a) COBE 2991 modified internally to allow coolant (polyethylene glycol) from a chiller to circulate either side of the spindle and around the bowl (original system), and b) an air-cooled system using an air conditioner to blow cold air into the bowl from above (air cooler system). Cooling required 20 min for the original system and temperature was stabilized within 4-7 degrees C. The air system cooled rapidly but was not stable. There was an increase in the temperature of the medium with using both systems during centrifugation because of heat generated by the COBE machine; however, the temperature of the medium after centrifugation with the air system was significantly higher than that with the original system (13.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C vs. 8.7 +/- 0.7 degrees C, p < 0.05). The original cooler system was found to be more efficient at reducing heat generated by the COBE machine than the air system. Further investigation of the importance of the recorded temperatures is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it