Longitudinal- and transverse-operators formalism for chiral media: Application to guided structures filled with chiral materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper an approach based on the calculation of longitudinal and transverse operators is presented. The paper is devoted to the interesting topic of electromagnetic-wave propagation in complex (chiral) media. The studied process allows the analysis of guidedstructures with chiral-medium components. In this case the equations are continuously coupled. Using the longitudinal equations, we analyze wave propagation in a parallel-plate chirowaveguide consisting of two parallel perfectly conducting planes filled with a lossless, homogeneous, isotropic chiral material. The main feature of the guides is that the propagation modes are always hybrid. In addition, bifurcated modes exist with the same cutoff-frequency values and unequal propagation characteristics. We address here the issue of wave propagation in a rectangular chirowaveguide, by means of longitudinal and transverse operators. This topic was first addressed by Engheta and Pelet. (IEEE Trans. Antenna Propag. 38, 90 (1990)). We rederive their results, using a method based on a new mathematical approach that seems to be original.PACS Nos.: 41.20.Jb
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".