MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982203856 · doi:10.1139/p03-126

Longitudinal- and transverse-operators formalism for chiral media: Application to guided structures filled with chiral materials

2004· article· en· W1982203856 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rachid Oussaid, Brahim Haraoubia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTransverse planeIsotropyCutoffFormalism (music)Wave propagationHomogeneousLossless compressionCutoff frequencyClassical mechanicsOpticsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper an approach based on the calculation of longitudinal and transverse operators is presented. The paper is devoted to the interesting topic of electromagnetic-wave propagation in complex (chiral) media. The studied process allows the analysis of guidedstructures with chiral-medium components. In this case the equations are continuously coupled. Using the longitudinal equations, we analyze wave propagation in a parallel-plate chirowaveguide consisting of two parallel perfectly conducting planes filled with a lossless, homogeneous, isotropic chiral material. The main feature of the guides is that the propagation modes are always hybrid. In addition, bifurcated modes exist with the same cutoff-frequency values and unequal propagation characteristics. We address here the issue of wave propagation in a rectangular chirowaveguide, by means of longitudinal and transverse operators. This topic was first addressed by Engheta and Pelet. (IEEE Trans. Antenna Propag. 38, 90 (1990)). We rederive their results, using a method based on a new mathematical approach that seems to be original.PACS Nos.: 41.20.Jb

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207