MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982231889 · doi:10.1117/12.857285

IMAKA: imaging from MAuna KeA optical design

2010· article· en· W1982231889 on OpenAlexaffabout
Clinton Evans, Hua Lin, Ashley McColgan, Neil Rowlands, Derrick Salmon

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsCOM DEV International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive opticsTelescopeOpticsComputer scienceField of viewTilt (camera)DetectorRemote sensingImage qualityOptical instrumentOptical telescopePhysicsImage (mathematics)GeologyComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 'IMAKA (Imaging from MAuna KeA) instrument is a wide field visible light imager incorporating Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) to take maximum advantage of the excellent seeing available at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT). It requires better than 0.3" image quality simultaneously over a total field of view of approximately one square degree (~3 x 10<sup>-4</sup> sr). This requirement along with other criterions and constraints raises a challenge for optical design. The advent of orthogonal transfer (OT) CCDs allows the tip-tilt portion of the atmospheric correction to be performed at the science detector itself. 'IMAKA will take full advantage of the large array mosaics of OTCCDs. Since the size of the adaptive mirror would drive the cost and hence implementation of the overall 'IMAKA instrument, a review of possible optical design configurations which minimize the size (diameter) of the deformable mirror is undertaken. A promising design was obtained and developed in more detail. This all reflective system is described along with its predicted optical performance. An opto-mechanical design concept was developed around this nominal optical design which takes into account various constraints due to its required location on the top end of the Canada France Hawaii Telescope. The design concept is feasible and meets the optical performance requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207