MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982235985 · doi:10.1179/016164105x40066

Extent of spontaneous cross-flow via the anterior communicating artery in steno-occlusive carotid artery disease

2005· article· en· W1982235985 on OpenAlex
Gernot Schulte‐Altedorneburg, Tilman Becker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurological Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
KeywordsMedicineDigital subtraction angiographyInternal carotid arteryStenosisAnterior cerebral arteryRadiologyMiddle cerebral arteryUltrasoundAnterior communicating arteryCerebral arteriesArteryCardiologyAngiographyIschemiaAneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the agreement of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) measurements and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings in determining the extent of spontaneous cross-flow via the anterior communicating artery (AcoA) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. METHODS: Thirty adult patients with suspected uni- or bilateral high-grade carotid artery stenosis were prospectively examined by DSA and angle-corrected TCCS. The extent of cross-flow was determined considering retrograde flow in the ipsilateral anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and sideto-side differences of the A1-segments of the ACA and middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) by both techniques. Cross-flow was angiographically categorized by means of a four-step scale. DSA findings were correlated with side-to-side differences in mean blood flow velocity as well as flow direction measured by TCCS. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 30 patients had a uni- or bilateral ICA stenosis of >49%. Excellent agreement between TCCS and DSA was evaluated for the detection of lack (grades 0 and 1) or presence (grades 2 and 3) of reversed flow in the ACA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 94%). Post hoc analysis of the mean velocities in the ACA and MCA revealed a side-to-side difference of 25 cm/s as a cutting point allowing for definition of a corresponding four-grade scale for ultrasound. However, full agreement, i.e.same grade of cross-flow detected by both techniques, was only found in 17(57%) of 30 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive TCCS is reliable for detecting reversed flow in the ACA in patients with ICA stenosis. However, there is only a moderate agreement between angiography and TCCS in quantifying the extent of spontaneous anterior cross-flow because different information on the intracranial hemodynamics may be obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it