Apparently Unstable Normal <i>FMR1</i> Alleles in Nine Developmentally Delayed Patients: Implications for Molecular Diagnosis of the Fragile X Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Fragile X syndrome is a common form of X-linked mental retardation, affecting approximately 1 in 4,000 males. Since the discovery of the FMR1 gene responsible for the syndrome, molecular, rather than cytogenetic, diagnosis of Fragile X syndrome has become the gold standard. Numerous molecular diagnostic centers worldwide use PCR and Southern blotting to characterize the size of the CGG repeats within the gene, expansion of which has been shown to be associated with the vast majority of cases of Fragile X syndrome. Instability of this repeat through successive generations has been demonstrated in many patients and has been associated with numerous factors, including repeat length and molecular structure of the repeat. Nine males with normal-size alleles that exhibit repeat length instability by the presence of a second normal length distinct band by repeated PCR analysis from peripheral lymphocytes are reported. Many hypotheses addressing the reason for this apparent instability were tested without elucidating the underlying molecular causes, including cytogenetic analysis, sequence analysis of the repeat locus, and analysis of flanking dinucleotide repeat loci. All patients exhibited a normal complement of sex chromosomes by cytogenetic and molecular analysis. These results from the widely used PCR analysis illustrate an interesting molecular phenomenon and raise many questions relating to the factors and mechanisms involved in trinucleotide instability as well as having implications for the diagnostic testing of the Fragile X syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".