MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982252279 · doi:10.1089/vbz.2006.0624

Identification of Salp15 Homologues in <i>Ixodes ricinus</i> Ticks

2007· article· en· W1982252279 on OpenAlexaff
Joppe W. Hovius, Nandhini Ramamoorthi, Cornelis van’t Veer, Karel de Groot, Ard M. Nijhof, Frans Jongejan, Alje P. van Dam, Erol Fikrig

Bibliographic record

VenueVector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
KeywordsIxodes scapularisBorrelia burgdorferiBiologyIxodes ricinusIxodesRicinusTickSensuVirologyPolymerase chain reactionVector (molecular biology)GeneticsMicrobiologyGeneAntibodyZoologyGenusBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 15-kDa Ixodes scapularis salivary gland protein Salp15 protects Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto from antibody-mediated killing and facilitates infection of the mammalian host. In addition, Salp 15 has been shown to inhibit T-cell activation. We determined whether Ixodes ricinus, the major vector for Lyme borreliosis in Western Europe, also express salp15-related genes. We show that engorged I. ricinus express salp15 and we have identified three Salp15 homologues within these ticks by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). One of the predicted proteins showed 80% similarity to I. scapularis Salp15, evenly distributed over the entire amino acid sequence, whereas the two other predicted proteins showed approximately 60% similarity, mainly confined to the signal sequence and C-terminus. Comparison of the DNA and protein sequences with those deposited in several databases indicates that these proteins are part of a Salp15 family of which members are conserved among different Ixodes species, all capable of transmitting B. burgdorferi sensu lato. This suggests that these Salp15 homologues could also play a role in the transmission of diverse Borrelia species and in inhibition of T-cell activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVector-Borne and Zoonotic DiseasesSame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207