MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1982271333 · doi:10.1118/1.1998552

WE‐D‐I‐609‐07: Analysis of Growth Dynamics of Treated Murine Liver Metastases Using Volumetric Ultrasound Micro‐Imaging

2005· article· en· W1982271333 on OpenAlexaff
LA Wirtzfeld, KC Graham, LT MacKenzie, CO Postenka, AC Groom, IC MacDonald, Aaron Fenster, Ann F. Chambers, JC Lacefield

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGompertz functionMedicineUltrasoundMetastasisNuclear medicineUrologyRadiologyCancerMathematicsInternal medicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Two methods were compared for analyzing therapeutic responses in an experimental murine liver metastasis model using longitudinal high‐frequency three‐dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging. Method and Materials: B16F1 mouse melanoma cells were injected into the mesenteric vein of C57BL/6 mice to produce liver metastases. Treated mice received doxorubicin every second day starting seven days post injection and continuing until day 17. Untreated mice received saline injections on the same schedule. Imaging began eight days post injection and was performed every one to two days until day 19. Three‐dimensional images were acquired using a VisualSonics Vevo 660 ultrasound system with a 40 MHz transducer. Metastasis volumes were measured in 3D images by manual segmentation. Two growth curves were constructed for each metastasis by computing least‐squares fits of an exponential function and a Gompertz function, which is an exponential with a time‐varying rate parameter, to the volume data. Results: Eight untreated and 24 treated metastases were monitored. A significant (p < 0.05 in Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests) difference in untreated and treated tumor volumes was observed as early as day 12. The growth of untreated metastases was described equally well by exponential (mean ± standard deviation of ) or Gompertz functions. However, Gompertz functions modeled the growth of treated metastases more precisely than exponential functions . The difference between exponential and Gompertz r2 values for treated growth curves was significant (p = 0.040). Conclusion: High‐frequency 3D ultrasound imaging is sensitive to changes in murine liver metastasis growth rate produced by a chemotherapeutic agent, and may be capable of characterizing temporal variations in the growth rates of treated tumors. Conflict of Interest: VisualSonics has licensed 3D reconstruction, visualization, and segmentation software from our laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→