MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982271612 · doi:10.1002/chem.200701411

Self‐Assembly of N<sup>2</sup>‐Modified Guanosine Derivatives: Formation of Discrete G‐Octamers

2007· article· en· W1982271612 on OpenAlexaff
Sanela Martić, Xiangyang Liu, Suning Wang, Gang Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryGuanosineHistone octamerRandom hexamerLigand (biochemistry)CrystallographyStackingStereochemistryMonomerMoleculeReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the presence of Na(+) ions, two N(2)-modified guanosine derivatives, N(2)-(4-n-butylphenyl)-2',3',5'-O-triacetylguanosine (G1) and N(2)-(4-pyrenylphenyl)-2',3',5'-O-triacetylguanosine (G2), are found to self-associate into discrete octamers that contain two G-quartets and a central ion. In each octamer, all eight guanosine molecules are in a syn conformation and the two G-quartets are stacked in a tail-to-tail fashion. On the basis of NMR spectroscopic evidence, we hypothesize that the pi-pi-stacking interaction between the N(2)-side arms (phenyl in G1 and pyrenyl in G2) can considerably stabilize the octamer structure. For G1, we have used NMR spectroscopic saturation-transfer experiments to monitor the kinetic ligand exchange process between monomers and octamers in CD(3)CN. The results show that the activation energy (E(a)) of the ligand exchange process is 31 +/-5 kJ mol(-1). An Eyring analysis of the saturation transfer data yields the enthalpy and entropy of activation for the transition state: DeltaH(not =)=29 +/-5 kJ mol(-1) and DeltaS(not =)=-151 +/-10 J mol(-1) K(-1). These results are consistent with an associative mechanism for ligand exchange.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicMolecular Sensors and Ion DetectionFrench-language works237,207