Synthesis and solid-state molecular structures of bis- and mono-nitrosobenzene complexes of ruthenium porphyrins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bis-nitrosobenzene complexes of the form (por)Ru(PhNO)2 (por = TPP, TTP; TPP = tetraphenylporphyrinato dianion, TTP = tetratolylporphyrinato dianion) have been prepared in good yields from the reaction of the (por)Ru(CO) precursor with excess PhNO in dichloromethane. The IR spectra of the complexes (as KBr pellets) displayed new bands at ~1348 cm1, due to υNO. The solid-state molecular structure of (TPP)Ru(PhNO)2 was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and revealed that the PhNO ligands are bound to the Ru center via the N-binding mode. Reactions of the (por)Ru(PhNO)2 complexes with excess 1-methylimidazole gave the mono-nitrosobenzene complexes (por)Ru(PhNO)(1-MeIm). The IR spectra revealed a lowering of υNO in these mononitrosobenzene derivatives by ~27 cm1, a feature consistent with the replacement of one π-acid PhNO ligand with the more basic 1-MeIm ligand. The solid-state molecular structure of (TPP)Ru(PhNO)(1-MeIm) reveals, in addition to the N-binding of the PhNO ligand, an essentially parallel arrangement of the C-N-O (of PhNO) and imidazole planes; this is in contrast with the (TPP)Ru(PhNO)2 complex, in which the C-N-O planes (of PhNO) are essentially perpendicular.Key words: nitroso, X-ray, ruthenium, porphyrin, imidazole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".