Remission From Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults With Mood Disorders: Findings of a Representative Community Sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with remission in a community-dwelling sample of older Canadians with mood disorders. METHODS: We used a representative community survey conducted in 6 Canadian provinces. Data were gathered by telephone and in-person interviews. The response rate was 79%. Those in institutions were excluded from the sampling frame. Our sample was limited to community-dwelling individuals, aged 55 and over, who reported that they had been diagnosed by a health professional with a mood disorder at some point in their life. Only those with mood disorders that lasted 6 months or more were included in the sample (n = 1,161). Remission from depression was calculated using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short Form (CIDI-SF). Individuals were classified as in remission if CIDI-SF < 0.9. RESULTS: Three-quarters (76%) of older adults with mood disorders had been symptom-free for the preceding year. The logistic regression analyses indicated that the married, those aged 65 and over, those in good to excellent health, and those who reported minimal stress had the highest odds of remission. Gender, immigration status, education level, household income, number of chronic conditions, activities of daily living limitations, comorbid anxiety disorders, and physical activity level were not associated with the likelihood of remission. CONCLUSION: Remission rates in this community sample of older adults with mood disorders were much higher than in previous clinical samples. Strategies to improve identification and outreach to those least likely to be in remission from depression are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".