MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982362961 · doi:10.1139/g09-059

Evaluation of degenerating germ cells in normal juvenile mice

2009· article· en· W1982362961 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anastassia Trifonova, Peter B. Møens

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTUNEL assayGerm cellSpermiogenesisSpermatogenesisAndrologyTerminal deoxynucleotidyl transferaseApoptosisMeiosisGonocyteProgrammed cell deathCell biologyMolecular biologyImmunologyGeneticsEndocrinologyGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Absence of spermiogenesis in mice with meiotic defects complicates the staging of meiotic arrest using light microscopy. Consequently, new methodologies are required to establish accurate relationships among germ cells. In this study, we utilized a novel approach to analyze germ cell degeneration in juvenile mice. We used terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) in combination with meiosis-specific antibodies. Germ cell degeneration is a normal component of early spermatogenesis in juvenile mice. The incidence of germ cell death was monitored at various postnatal ages of mice using the TUNEL assay to quantify the incidence of apoptosis. Cell death occurred predominantly at 15.5 days after birth. It was found that groups of apoptotic cells were apparent in tubules containing two generations of spermatocytes that form in two progressive cohorts. Electron microscopic observations further illustrated that the majority of cells in the first cohort are in late pachytene, while groups of cells in the second cohort can degenerate in early pachytene. The methodology utilized in this study is significant because it allows one to accurately determine the point at which germ cells arrest. Consequently, we believe that these methods can be applied to study animals with meiotic defects that prevent spermiogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207