Aggresome Formation by the Adenoviral Protein E1B55K Is Not Conserved among Adenovirus Species and Is Not Required for Efficient Degradation of Nuclear Substrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Much of the work on the basic molecular biology of human adenoviruses has been carried out on a very limited number of the more than 60 serotypes, primarily the highly related species C viruses adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) and Ad2 and, to some extent, Ad12 of species A. Until recently, it has been widely assumed that insights obtained with these model viruses were representative of all human adenoviruses. Recent studies on the E3 ubiquitin ligase formed by the viral E1B55K and E4orf6 proteins with a cellular Cullin-based complex indicated that although all species form such a functional complex, significant variations exist in terms of complex composition and the substrates that are degraded. In the present report we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the localization of E1B55K products from representatives of six of the seven adenovirus species in the presence and the absence of the corresponding E4orf6 protein. We found that although in some species E1B55K localized in aggresomes, such was not always the case, suggesting that these structures are not necessary for the efficient degradation of substrates. In addition, differences were evident in the localization of E1B55K, although all forms readily associated with PML. Finally, Ad5 E1B55K was seen to localize in close proximity to Rab11, a marker for the endosomal recycling compartment, and both focused at the microtubule organizing center. These findings suggest that E1B55K from some species may employ the transport system utilized by the membrane recycling pathway to assemble aggresomes and the possibility that this structure might then affect recycling of cell surface components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".