MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982366172 · doi:10.1080/07055900.2000.9649642

Performance of the Canadian land surface scheme at temperate aspen‐birch and mixed forests, and a boreal young jack pine forest: Tests involving canopy conductance parametrizations

2000· article· en· W1982366172 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paul Bartlett, J. H. McCaughey, Peter M. Lafleur, Diana Verseghy

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaTrent UniversityQueen's University
FundersOregon State University
KeywordsSensible heatLatent heatEnvironmental scienceCanopyTemperate climateBorealCanopy conductanceAtmospheric sciencesLeaf area indexBiometeorologyTemperate rainforestEddy covarianceStomatal conductanceTranspirationGeographyVapour Pressure DeficitMeteorologyEcologyEcosystemGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) was evaluated using off‐line tests, with data collected at temperate aspen‐birch and mixed forests located near Chalk River, Ontario, and at a young jack pine forest located near Thompson, Manitoba. Measurements of stomatal conductance and leaf area index were used to develop canopy conductance parametrizations for the aspen‐birch and the jack pine stands, and these were incorporated into CLASS in a modified run. The behaviour of the residuals from the unmodified run with respect to environmental variables at the mixed stand were used as a guide to producing a modified ad‐hoc canopy conductance parametrization for use at that site. It was found that CLASS exaggerates the diurnal range in soil heat flux. This leads to an underestimation of the diurnal range in available energy, and it is argued that this has implications for its partitioning into the turbulent fluxes of sensible and latent heat. Over time, systematic errors will accumulate which, in the case of the latent heat flux, can affect the long‐term water balance. Errors in the size of the turbulent fluxes over short time periods can limit the usefulness of CLASS for resolving mesoscale circulations in a regional model. These problems are believed to be related to CLASS's assumption of zero wind speed under the canopy, and the lack of an insulating litter layer at the soil surface. An unmodified CLASS produced estimates of sensible and latent heat fluxes that broadly agreed with measured values at the temperate stands but not at the jack pine stand, where the latent heat flux was significantly overestimated. The modified canopy conductance parametri‐zations improved the representation of the latent heat flux at all of the sites, particularly at the jack pine stand. Overestimation at the aspen‐birch stand may be related to site heterogeneity not being adequately represented in the measurement of stomatal conductance, or to difficulties in defining the vertical distribution of leaf area index for scaling stomatal conductance to the canopy level. As expected, a positive or negative bias in the modelled latent heat flux is associated with an opposite bias in the modelled sensible heat flux. The tendency towards positive intercepts and slopes less than unity in linear regressions relating modelled and measured fluxes is a symptom of the underestimation of the diurnal range in available energy. Recommendations are made to allow for vertical discontinuities in texture within a soil layer and a variable permeable depth, and to allow transpiration when the soil water suction exceeds –1.5 MPa. This is particularly important when soil moisture or texture is heterogeneous. Finally, it is suggested that volumetric soil moistures should be allowed to fall below the originally prescribed limiting value of 0.04. This is necessary for evaporation to continue in very sandy, dry soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207