MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of bFGF-Chitosan Matrices and Their Interactions with Human Dermal Fibroblast Cells

2009· article· en· W1982376169 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasic fibroblast growth factorChitosanFibroblastGlucosamineChemistryTissue engineeringBiophysicsIn vitroCell growthProtein adsorptionAdsorptionMaterials scienceGrowth factorBiochemistryBiomedical engineeringOrganic chemistryReceptorBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chitosan (CH) is a naturally derived, biodegradable polymer of glucosamine with a variable frequency of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine units, and has been demonstrated to have numerous pharmacological and wound-healing properties. Biodegradable chitosan films were fabricated using a solvent casting technique and investigated for skin tissue-engineering applications. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was incorporated into the CH matrices (1 microg/film) by 3 methods: adsorption, entrapment and covalent binding. Release rates and biological activity of the incorporated bFGF were monitored. Human dermal fibroblasts (HDF cells) were used as an in vitro model for cell response to CH and bFGF-CH films. Cell attachment, growth and acid-soluble collagen quantification were employed as an assessment of cell function. The fibroblasts were found to remain viable on the chitosan films and scaffolds. CH films without bFGF were compatible with HDF cells; however, the fibroblasts did not proliferate. The release profile of adsorbed and bound bFGF from CH films were similar (indicating that binding was not efficient) while entrapped bFGF was not released in the time frame studied. The concentration of bFGF released to the cell culture medium was not high enough to stimulate HDF proliferation. However, cell attachment was significantly increased in chitosan films with bFGF adsorbed onto the surface as compared to control surfaces. HDF cells grown on CH films produced significantly more collagen than those on control surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it