MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982379331 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.024538

Upper critical field in two-band superconductivity

2005· article· en· W1982379331 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Mansor, J. P. Ćarbotte

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsSuperconductivityCritical fieldPhysicsAnisotropyScatteringImpurityCoupling (piping)Materials scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a generalization of the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg equations to strong coupling and to two-band superconductivity to study the dependence of the upper critical field ${H}_{c2}(T)$ on anisotropy in the electron-phonon coupling and in the Fermi velocities, as well as on arbitrary values of intraband and interband impurity scattering. For a layered system such as $\mathrm{Mg}{\mathrm{B}}_{2}$, the temperature dependence of the critical magnetic $(H)$ field itself and the anisotropy ratio ${H}_{c2}^{ab}(T)∕{H}_{c2}^{c}(T)$ between $ab$ ($H$ in the basal plane) and $c$ ($H$ perpendicular to the basal plane) directions are studied. For $\mathrm{Mg}{\mathrm{B}}_{2}$, the anisotropy ratio is found to be particularly sensitive to intraband impurity scattering in the $\ensuremath{\pi}$ band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicSuperconductivity in MgB2 and AlloysFrench-language works237,207