MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982399886 · doi:10.1071/rdv23n1ab27

27 CLONING OF ADULT PIGS USING SCRIPTAID TREATMENT AND PREOVULATORY EMBRYO TRANSFER

2010· article· en· W1982399886 on OpenAlexaff
Marcelo S. Albornoz, C. Colato, N. El-Beyrouthi, F. Mellano, A. Mellano, P. H. Mellano, M. L. Mellano, M. A. Mellano, J. C. Mellano, Hernán Baldassarre, Vilceu Bordignon

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySte. Anne's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatic cell nuclear transferAndrologyEmbryoEmbryo transferCloning (programming)BlastocystGametogenesisOocyteEmbryo cultureBiologyReproductive technologyMolecular biologyChemistryEmbryogenesisCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is growing interest in the use of swine in biomedical research. Cloning from cultured somatic cells (SCNT) has been the preferred method to generate genetically modified swine models. In a recent report, swine cloning efficiency was increased by treatment of reconstructed embryos with the inhibitor of deacetylase enzymes Scriptaid (Zhao et al. 2010 Cel. Reprog. 12, 75). Also, the timing of SCNT-embryo transfer with respect to the recipient’s expected time of ovulation was shown to affect cloning efficiency, whereas preovulatory embryo transfer resulted in a higher rate of cloned piglets born compared to postovulatory embryo transfer (Petersen et al. 2008 Cloning Stem Cells 10, 355). Therefore, our objective was to combine Scriptaid treatment and preovulatory embryo transfer in the same protocol for swine cloning. Cumulus–oocyte complexes aspirated from 3- to 6-mm diameter follicles were matured in vitro under standard conditions (Martinez Diaz et al. 2010 Cel. Reprog. 12, 85) and used as host oocytes for SCNT. Fibroblast cell lines were established from skin biopsies collected from 2 adult boars and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotics. Oocytes were micromanipulated in Tyrode’s lactate-pyruvate-HEPES medium supplemented with 7.5 µg mL–1 cytochalasin B (CB) and electrically fused using a single DC pulse of 1.6 kV cm–1 for 70 µs. Activation was performed using ionomycin (15 µM/5 min) followed by exposure to CB (7.5 µg mL–1) and cyclohexemide (10 µg mL–1) for 5 h in porcine zygote medium (PZM-3; Yoshioka et al. 2002 Biol. Reprod. 66, 112). Reconstructed embryos were exposed to 500 nM Scriptaid for 10 to 12 h starting after ionomycin treatment. Oocytes were then washed and cultured in PZM-3 medium until transfer. Peripubertal recipient gilts were synchronized by oral administration of altrenogest (Regu-Mate®; 20 mg day–1) for 12 days, followed by 1.000 IU eCG injected on the last day of altrenogest treatment and 500 IU hCG 72 h later. 1-cell stage embryos were transferred into the oviduct after ~20 h from hCG injection or 22 h before the expected ovulation time. Pregnancy was confirmed and monitored by ultrasonography and parturition was induced by injecting PGF2a at Day 115 of pregnancy. A total of 840 reconstructed embryos were transferred into 10 gilts [average 84 (range 60–110) embryos/gilt]. 4 gilts (40%) were detected to be pregnant 4 weeks after transfer, and 2 (20%) delivered 1 (1100 g) and 2 (950 and 850 g) healthy cloned piglets. The number of embryos transferred to these 2 gilts was 85 and 70. These results confirm that Scriptaid treatment and preovulatory embryo transfer can be applied in the same cloning protocol to produce cloned piglets from adult cell lines. To our knowledge, these are the first cloned pigs produced in Latin America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207