Evolution of Clinical and Molecular Responses to Bexarotene Treatment in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of action of bexarotene are not well understood. METHODS: A retrospective study on patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) treated with bexarotene was performed to see if bexarotene could act on the dominant T-cell clones. Thirty-five patients were included. Twenty-three were treated with bexarotene for more than 3 months (300 mg/m(2)). In 7 patients, phototherapy was given with bexarotene. RESULTS: Dominant T-cell clones were observed in 11 patients in peripheral blood and in 19 patients in skin. Our results demonstrate no significant evolution of T-cell clones either in skin or peripheral blood. Furthermore, the detection of T-cell clones in peripheral blood before starting bexarotene was significantly associated with the progression of the disease. UV therapy given with bexarotene significantly improved therapeutic response without any correlation with T-cell clones. CONCLUSION: This is the first study on the evolution of the T-cell clone in blood and skin in CTCL patients during bexarotene therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".