Synthesis and evaluation of new chiral nonracemic C2-symmetric and unsymmetric 2,2′-bipyridyl ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis of a series of chiral nonracemic and C2-symmetric 2,2'-bipyridyl ligands (R = Me, i-Pr and Ph) as well as the syntheses of the corresponding unsymmetric 2,2'-bipyridyl ligands (R = Me and Ph) is described. These bipyridyl ligands were prepared, in a notably direct and modular fashion, from the readily available and corresponding 2-chloropyridine acetals (R = Me, i-Pr and Ph). The bipyridyl ligands were evaluated in copper(I)-catalyzed cyclopropanation reactions of styrene with the ethyl and t-butyl esters of diazoacetic acid. The stereoselectivities, as well as the yields of the cyclopropanation reactions, were dependant on the ratio of the bipyridyl ligands and copper triflate that was employed. The best result was obtained in the asymmetric cyclopropanation reaction of styrene and tert-butyl diazoacetate with the C2-symmetric bipyridyl ligand (R = i-Pr). This afforded the corresponding trans-cyclopropane in good diastereoselectivity (4 : 1) and in moderate enantioselectivity (44% ee). The X-ray structure determination of a complex formed between the C2-symmetric 2,2'-bipyridyl ligand (R = Ph) and copper(I) chloride showed that two bipyridyl ligands had coordinated to the copper(I) ion. This information, along with the results of a series of cyclopropanation reactions and NMR data, led to the conclusion that the 2,2'-bipyridyl ligands had the propensity to form catalytically inactive bis-ligated copper(I) species in solution that were in equilibrium with catalytically active copper(i) triflate and the desired mono-ligated copper(I) species. Moreover, it was observed that the complex of the bipyridyl ligand (R = Ph) and copper(I) chloride had a particularly large optical rotation (sodium D-line). The maximum positive optical rotation was subsequently found to be +1.1 x 10(4) at 304 nm and the maximum negative optical rotation was -1.3 x 10(4) at 329 nm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".