MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982539563 · doi:10.1299/jsdd.1.536

Genetic Fuzzy Control for Path-Tracking of an Autonomous Robotic Bicycle

2007· article· en· W1982539563 on OpenAlexaff
Chih‐Keng Chen, Thanh-Son Dao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of System Design and Dynamics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsHolonomicControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicPath (computing)Genetic algorithmFuzzy control systemConstraint (computer-aided design)Motion planningTracking (education)Controller (irrigation)Nonholonomic systemComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationControl (management)Mobile robotArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to its non-holonomic constraints and a highly unstable nature, the autonomous bicycle is difficult to be controlled for tracking a target path while retaining its balance. As a result of the non-holonomic constraint conditions, the instantaneous velocity of the vehicle is limited to certain directions. Constraints of this kind occur under the no-slip condition. In this study, the problem of optimization of fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs) for path-tracking of an autonomous robotic bicycle using genetic algorithm (GA) is focused. In order to implement path-tracking algorithm, strategies for balancing and tracking a given roll-angle are also addressed. The proposed strategy optimizes FLCs by keeping the rule-table fixed and tuning their membership functions by introducing the scaling factors (SFs) and deforming coefficients (DCs). The numerical simualtions prove the effectiveness of the proposed structure of the genetic fuzzy controller for the developed bicycle system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of System Design and DynamicsSame topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207