MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982684022 · doi:10.1021/jp068554x

Investigation of Inter-Ion Interactions in<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>',<i>N</i>'-Tetramethylethylenediammonium Dithiocyanate via Experimental and Theoretical Charge Density Studies

2007· article· en· W1982684022 on OpenAlexaff
Parthapratim Munshi, E.M. Cameron, Tayur N. Guru Row, Joseph D. Ferrara, T. Stanley Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipole expansionIonChemistryCharge densityDensity functional theoryCrystallographyBasis setHydrogen bondCrystal structureMoleculeDiffractionCharge (physics)Crystal (programming language)Computational chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of the N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediammonium dithiocyanate salt has been examined by experimental charge density studies from high-resolution X-ray diffraction data. The corresponding results are compared with multipole refinements, using theoretical structure factors obtained from a periodic density functional theory calculation at the B3LYP level with a 6-31G(**) basis set. The salt crystallizes in space group P and contains only a single ion pair with an inversion center in the cation. The salt has thus one unique classical N+-H...(NCS)(-) hydrogen bond but also has six other weaker interactions: four C-H...S, one C-H...N, and one C-H...C(pi). The nature of all these interactions has been examined topologically using Bader's quantum theory of "atoms in molecules" and all eight of the Koch-Popelier criteria. The experimental and theoretical approaches agree well and both show that the inter-ion interactions, even in this simplest of systems, play an integrated and complex role in the packing of the ions in the crystal. Electrostatic potential maps are derived from experimental charge densities. This is the first time such a system has been examined in detail by these methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207