MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A randomised controlled trial of biopsy forceps and cannula aspiration for transcervical chorionic villus sampling

2005· article· en· W1982800586 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter von Dadelszen, Mathew Sermer, Joan Hillier, Lynn C. Allen, Jo‐Ann M. Johnson, J. Shime, E.J.T. Winsor, Greg Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of AucklandConnaught FundUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicineForcepsChorionic villus samplingSampling (signal processing)CannulaBiopsyVacuum aspirationSurgeryObstetricsRadiologyPregnancyComputer sciencePrenatal diagnosisResearch methodologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This trial compared two instruments for transcervical chorionic villus sampling (CVS). DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Regional university prenatal diagnosis and treatment centre. POPULATION: Two hundred women were randomised at 10(+0)-12(+6) weeks of gestation to transcervical CVS using cannula aspiration (CA) or biopsy forceps (BF). METHODS: Women undergoing indicated CVS signed informed consent. Randomisation after decision to perform transcervical CVS. PRIMARY OUTCOME: the rise in maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (alpha-FP). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (i) placental trauma (fetomaternal haemorrhage [FMH]); (ii) laboratory, procedure, and cytogenetic results and pregnancy outcomes; (iii) patient and operator satisfaction; and (iv) economic analyses. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. RESULTS: The -FP rise did not differ between groups; there was no other evidence of placental trauma. BF were better tolerated by women, provided culturable tissue, after fewer instrument passes, with greater ease and in less time. BF were associated with cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike -FP, other markers of FMH were unaltered, questioning the reliability of alpha-FP as an indicator of FMH. Compared with CA, transcervical BF caused comparable placental trauma, appeared to be similarly effective and safe and were preferred by operators and patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207