Neutron and Gamma-ray Detection using a Cs<sub>2</sub>LiYCl<sub>6</sub>Scintillator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new scintillator, Cs2LiYCl6 (CLYC), has recently gained interest due to its dual capability to detect neutron and gamma radiation. In addition to its high resolution to detect gamma-rays, this sensor can serve in detecting both thermal and fast neutrons through 6Li(n,α) and 35Cl(n,p) reactions, respectively. For fast neutron detection, the current sensor technology has challenges and drawbacks, such as detection efficiency and energy dependence. In this regard, due to the presence of the 35Cl isotope, CLYC can overcome those challenges. The response functions of this scintillator to neutron and gamma radiation has been obtained using Monte Carlo N-Particle eXtended code (MCNPX). The simulation results and the sensor’s applicability to neutron spectrometry and dosimetry has been discussed and analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".