Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-1 by the reninangiotensin system during regression of cardiac eccentric hypertrophy through angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and AT<sub>1</sub> antagonist
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angiotensin II (Ang II) mediates its effects through its non-tyrosine-kinase G protein coupled Ang-II type 1 receptor (AT1). Growing evidence indicates that a functional insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) tyrosine kinase receptor is required for Ang-II-induced mitogenesis. Along with Ang II, we have previously shown that changes in IGF-1 receptor binding at myofibers are causative agents for cardiac eccentric hypertrophy. This study investigated the interaction of the renin-angiotensin system with the IGF-1 receptor during the development and regression of cardiac hypertrophy. Alterations in IGF-1 binding were evaluated in the CHAPS-pretreated perfused heart. Four weeks of aortocaval shunt increased relative heart mass by 76% without a major change in body mass or systolic blood pressure. Binding studies showed that IGF-1 has a higher affinity for the cardiac myofibers of shunt than sham rats. Two weeks of treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril (0.5 g/L in drinking water) or the AT1-antagonist losartan (10 mg/(kg x day)) reduced cardiac hypertrophy by 54 and 42%, respectively. However, while both ACE inhibition and AT1-antagonist treatments produced equivalent regression in ventricular hypertrophy, captopril was more efficacious than losartan in the regression of atrial hypertrophy. Regression of cardiac hypertrophy in the shunt by either captopril or losartan was accompanied with a reduction or normalization of the elevated IGF-1 affinity. Thus, the induction and regression of cardiac eccentric hypertrophy seems to be largely dependent on cross talk between the renin-angiotensin system and the IGF-1 axis at the receptor level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".