Performance of Associative Polymers in Porous Media
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The propagation of associative HPAM polymers in porous media is greatly dependent on the degree of hydrophobic modification. In this paper, the transport properties of several associative polymers with degree of association from none to high were investigated in Berea cores and silica sand-pack cores. The associative polymer solutions with customary bulk viscosities generated resistance factors that varied significantly, ranging from 10 to over 500. The increasing resistance factors were attributed to the higher level of polymer retention as the degree of association increased. On the other hand, two associative polymers, with a similar degree of association but different molecular weight and bulk viscosities generated similar resistance factors. Hence the effect of molecular weight and bulk viscosity is not as significant as hydrophobic modification in generating in-situ flow resistance. Linear coreflood tests were conducted to evaluate the potential of associative polymer flooding in recovering western Canadian heavy oil with viscosity of 18,700 mPa.s in 3-Darcy sandpacks. The properly selected associative polymer was able to propagate through the sandpack with no significant retention and generate in-situ apparent viscosity twice as high as the unmodified HPAM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it