MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982866705 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2013.6723806

Unsupervised classification of agricultural land cover using polarimetric synthetic aperture radar via a sparse texture dictionary model

2013· article· en· W1982866705 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Amelard, Alexander Wong, David A. Clausi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Land coverPixelSynthetic aperture radarClassifier (UML)Image textureContextual image classificationRemote sensingPolarimetryFeature vectorTexture (cosmology)Computer visionImage segmentationSegmentationImage (mathematics)GeographyLand use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sparse texture dictionary learning method for unsupervised land cover classification is presented. The method takes the stance that land cover in remote sensing data is best analysed in texture patches rather than localized pixels. To this end, a feature vector is designed that describes local texture information in a spatially coherent manner. This texture model is extracted for each pixel in the scene. A sparse dictionary of global texture models is then learned to characterize the underlying texture distribution of the scene in a simplified manner. An unsupervised classifier is learned using these global texture models for grouping pixels exhibiting high similarity. Being an unsupervised classifier, the class labels that are learned are unbiased toward human interpretation of the scene, and rather are learned according to the texture information. The method is validated using polarimetric SAR data over a Flevoland, Netherlands agriculture scene, but may be generalized to any remote sensing data. Promising experimental results show how the proposed method retains the spatial coherence of crops, and attains higher accuracy than recent unsupervised and supervised classification methods using the same data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207