Lack of a role for creatine phosphate kinase in sulphur mustard-induced cytotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several compounds involved in the creatine phosphate kinase (CPK) pathway were evaluated for their protective effects against the chemical warfare (CW) agent sulphur mustard (HD), in primary chick embryo neuron and first passage human skin keratinocyte cultures. High concentrations of both creatine and creatine phosphate were found to be protective under all culture conditions and increased the LC(50) of HD in both culture systems up to approximately 250%. Little difference was observed in the protective activity of these compounds in undifferentiated versus differentiated neuronal culture, or in proliferating versus differentiating cultures of keratinocytes. The protective effect of these compounds was found to be strictly prophylactic in nature. Although a modest decline in HD half-life was measured in buffer containing creatine phosphate, this did not account for the protective effects of this compound. In contrast to historical literature reporting 90-100% HD-induced CPK inhibition of purified enzyme, less than 30% of CPK activity was found to be inhibited by HD in both human keratinocytes and in swine blood plasma. Incubation of keratinocyte cultures with creatine or creatine phosphate prior to HD exposure did not alter CPK activity, compared with HD-only treated cultures. Although high mM concentrations of both creatine and creatine phosphate exert significant protective effects against HD, these results do not support a role for CPK in its toxicity or in the development of medical countermeasures against this CW agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".