MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982903140 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-1601

Abstract 1601: COX-2 and EP4 receptor as targets to ameliorate tumor growth, lymphangiogenesis, and metastasis in a murine breast cancer model

2010· article· en· W1982903140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peeyush K. Lala, Vik Mohindra, Xiping Xin, Ling Liu, Gannareddy V. Girish

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphangiogenesisAngiogenesisMetastasisCancer researchMedicineCancerBreast cancerPrimary tumorMatrigelVascular endothelial growth factor CVascular endothelial growth factorInternal medicineVascular endothelial growth factor A

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We had earlier shown that elevated cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 expression by breast cancer cells promotes tumor progression and metastasis by multiple mechanisms: inactivation of host immune cells, stimulation of tumor cell migration and tumor-associated angiogenesis. Furthermore, COX-2 was causally associated with increased VEGF-C expression/secretion in human breast cancer cell lines, corroborated with in situ studies on breast cancer tissue specimens, showing a strong correlation of COX-2 with VEGF-C and lymphangiogenic markers or lymphovascular density, implicated in lymphatic metastasis. VEGF-C upregulation resulted from PGE2-mediated stimulation of EP4, and to a smaller extent, EP1 receptors on breast cancer cells. Since human tumor xeno-transplants in immno-compromised hosts are less than ideal for a therapeutic testing of these findings, in the present study, we developed a syngeneic murine breast cancer model exhibiting lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in C3H/HeJ mice, using a highly metastatic, COX-2 expressing C3L5 cell line. This cell line was found to express VEGF-C and VEGF-D mRNA and proteins, and all four EP receptors. Expression of VEGF-C and VEGF-D were suppressed by treatment of cells with COX-2 inhibitors or EP4 antagonist in vitro. C3L5 cells suspended in growth factor-reduced Matrigel were implanted in both inguinal regions in mice that received oral treatments with COX-1/2 inhibitor indomethacin, COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib, EP1 antagonist ONO-8713 or EP4 antagonist ONO-AE3-208, to evaluate tumor growth, metastasis to lymph nodes and the lungs and tumor-associated angiogenesis (CD31 immuno-staining) and lymphangiogenesis (LYVE1 immunostaining). Mice were killed on days 8, 12 and 16. Tumor growth in control vehicle-treated mice was associated with high levels of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis at all intervals. VEGF-C protein expression was noted in 20-30% of tumor cells as well as macrophages in situ. Micro-metastasis to the lungs and local lymph nodes was noted as early as day 8 and increased thereafter. Metastasis to distant axillary nodes was seen at day16. Significant reduction in tumor growth, tumor-associated angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, and metastasis to the lungs and lymph nodes was achieved by therapies with indomethacin, celecoxib and ONO-AE3-208 but not ONO-8713 as compared to respective vehicle treatments. In conclusion, we have devised a syngeneic mouse breast cancer model mimicking human, showing successful chemo-intervention of tumor growth, tumor-associated angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis and metastasis to the lungs and lymph nodes with COX inhibitors and EP 4 antagonist. (Supported by grants from the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, Ontario chapter and the Ontario Institute of Cancer Research to PKL. EP antagonists were kindly provided by ONO pharmaceuticals, Japan and Celecoxib by Pfizer.) Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1601.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207