MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effectiveness Of A School Wide Intervention To Change Physical Activity Levels In High School Students

2009· article· en· W1982908551 on OpenAlexaffabout
Koren L. Fisher, Sarah Oosman, Karen Chad, M. Louise Humbert, Cathy Kryzanowski

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightCommitIntervention (counseling)Rural areaPhysical activityMotion (physics)PsychologyMedicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthObesityPhysical therapyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saskatchewan in motion is a partner-based provincial initiative aimed at increasing physical activity for health, social, environmental and economic benefits. Given the rise in the prevalence in overweight and obesity among youth, engaging schools in this initiative has been an ongoing priority. An in motion high school is one that values and actively promotes the health benefits of physical activity and supports opportunities for students and staff to be physically active on a regular basis. Schools that adopt the in motion strategy commit to providing a minimum of 30 minutes of PA every day for every student purpose: To evaluate the impact of a 5-month school-wide PA intervention among high school students. METHODS: A total of 339 students in grades 9-12 from 2 urban and 2 rural schools in a prairie province in Canada participated in the study. One urban (n=124) and one rural school (n=46) participated in the in motion initiative while the remaining urban (n=140) and rural (n=29) schools did not. Self-reported PA was assessed with the IPAQ and data were collected at the beginning of the initiative (January) and the end of the school year (May). Compliance to the in motion initiative was assessed using teacher records and logs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in PA scores from Time 1 to Time 2 in the urban in motion school. PA scores at the rural in motion school increased significantly from Time 1 to Time 2 (4,600.6 vs. 7,661. MET min/wk; p<.01). Among rural boys, participation in vigorous PA significantly increased (3,354.7 vs. 5,616.0 MET min/wk; p<.01), while among rural girls participation in moderate PA (821.5 vs. 1,655.8 MET min/wk; p<.05) and walking (1,000.2 vs. 2,021.7 MET min/wk; p<.05) was significantly higher. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the in motion initiative was effective at increasing PA levels among rural high school students. While boys increased their PA through vigorous activities, girls tended to increase their PA through low to moderate PA. Future research exploring gender differences and understanding more fully why such initiatives are more effective in rural vs. urban schools will enable programmers to further tailor such health promotion initiatives for high school students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207