Wave activity and baroclinic stability theorems for a two‐dimensional stratified semi‐geostrophic model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Arnold's method is used to derive two finite‐amplitude wave‐activity invariants – pseudo‐momentum and pseudo‐energy – based on the Hamiltonian structure for the two‐dimensional baroclinic semi‐geostrophic (SG) model in physical coordinates. The corresponding Liapunov stability theorems are established. For small‐amplitude disturbances the pseudo‐momentum and pseudo‐energy can be greatly simplified by introducing the quasi‐potential‐vorticity perturbation. The corresponding linear stability conditions, expressed explicitly in terms of the basic state, are obtained. The lateral boundary conditions are found to have a big impact on the stability of SG dynamics in both linear and nonlinear cases. The results show that nonlinear stability criteria are more complicated than linear stability criteria, in that they contain more conditions in the interior resulting from the inclusion of potential temperature and the nonlinearity of SG potential vorticity in the wave activity. It is also found that the nonlinear stability criteria for the SG model are very different from those for the quasi‐geostrophic (QG) model. The failure to extend the Liapunov stability theorems to the three‐dimensional SG model is discussed. It is found that this failure results from the third‐order nonlinear terms in the three‐dimensional SG potential vorticity. Since the variation of these terms in the wave activity is not sign‐definite, nonlinear stability conditions cannot be obtained. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".