Tobacco retailer density surrounding schools and cigarette access behaviors among underage smoking students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current tobacco access restrictions are ineffective because youth can find noncompliant retailers or social sources from which to get cigarettes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine characteristics related to the cigarettes access behaviors of underage smoking youth. METHODS: Data were collected from 20,297 students (Grades 9-12) attending 29 secondary schools in Ontario, Canada in 2001. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to examine how tobacco retailers surrounding schools, school smoking rates, and student characteristics were related to smokers buying their own cigarettes, getting someone else to buy their cigarettes, or getting their cigarettes from friends. RESULTS: Among underage smokers, 34.3% usually buy their own cigarettes, and 42.1% report that they are never asked for their age when trying to buy cigarettes. The more tobacco retailers there were surrounding a school, the more likely smokers were to buy their own cigarettes and the less likely they were to get someone else to buy their cigarettes. Students' smoking habits were also related to their cigarette access behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco retailer density surrounding schools is related to student cigarette access behaviors. Selective enforcement of youth access laws in retail outlets in close proximity to schools might help to prevent underage youth from smoking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it