Correction of megavoltage cone‐beam CT images for dose calculation in the head and neck region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography (MVCBCT) imaging systems are now available for image-guided radiation therapy delivery and verification. In order to use the three-dimensional anatomical information for dose calculation, the MVCBCT image must provide accurate electron density. This work proposes a new method that has been developed to correct for the cupping and missing data artifacts seen on MVCBCT images of the head and neck region. It uses a conventional kilovoltage CT (kVCT) image as a reference for electron density and rigid registration with a MVCBCT image to obtain correction factors. Dose calculations performed on MVCBCT images corrected with the proposed method agree with calculations done on kVCT images within +/- 1% on phantoms. With patients images the agreement is within +/- 13% above the shoulders and +/- 5% below the shoulder line. This level of dose calculation accuracy allows the use of MVCBCT images for dose verification purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".