MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983061810 · doi:10.1159/000179795

Testicular Responsiveness to hCG of the Ovine Fetus in the Last Third of Gestation

2008· article· en· W1983061810 on OpenAlexaff
R. Hamel, S. Savoie, R. Collu, J.M. Saez, J Bertrand, J.R. Ducharme

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyFetusAndrostenedioneTestosterone (patch)GestationIn vivoDehydroepiandrosteroneBasal (medicine)ChemistryGestational ageBiologyPregnancyAndrogenHormoneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The in vivo and in vitro testicular responsiveness to hCG of hemicastrated lamb fetuses 95-99, 110-118 and 130-141 days of gestational age was studied. Basal plasma testosterone (T) levels were similar at all ages (less than 0.25 ng/ml), while the mean testicular concentrations of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHA-S), 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) and T were higher in 95- to 99-day-fold fetuses. Plasma T levels and the concentration of T, DHA-S, 17-OHP, androstenedione (A) and cyclic adenosine 3'5'-monophosphate (cAMP) were increased by hCG in the hemicastrated animal at all ages. cAMP and T production by enriched preparations of dispersed interstitial cells from control testes was increased by hCG in all groups. In fetuses pretreated with hCG in vivo the addition of hCG in vitro failed to modify cAMP and T production. 100 micrograms of LHRH to a 130-day-old fetus increased plasma LH and T levels. From these experiments, it is suggested that the low plasma LH and T levels found throughout the last trimester of fetal life reflect a relative lack of endogenous LHRH synthesis and/or release, rather than reduced testicular steroidogenic capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHormone ResearchSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207