MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983098111 · doi:10.1159/000064252

Interest of Two-Dimensional Electrophoretic Analysis for the Characterization of the Individual Sensitization to Latex Allergens

2002· article· en· W1983098111 on OpenAlexaff
Hélène Chardin, Monika Raulf, Z. Chen, Hans‐Peter Rihs, Christine Mayer, F.X. Desvaux, Hélène Sénéchal, Gabriel Peltre

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatex allergyAllergenAllergySensitizationImmunoglobulin EImmunologyGel electrophoresisMedicineAntibodyChemistryBiologyMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Latex allergy is a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction that mainly affects high-risk populations such as health care workers, spina bifida-affected or multiply-operated children. Ten molecules have so far been identified and registered as latex allergens (Hev b 1 to Hev b 10). The aim of the present investigation was to identify the major latex allergens by an individual analysis of the IgE response of latex-allergic patients to latex proteins separated by two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Latex proteins from a sap or a glove extract were separated by 2-D electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Each membrane was incubated with the serum of one latex-allergic patient. The most frequently recognized latex allergens were characterized in sap and glove extracts using monoclonal antibodies or amino acid microsequencing. RESULTS: The one-dimensional screening of 54 patient sera revealed 4 major bands recognized by IgE. The 2-D analysis of the sensitization to latex allergens allows the identification of allergen isoforms and the characterization of an individual response diversity. Hev b 6.01 was recognized by 88.9% of the patients. Protein spots around 14 kD were recognized by 48.1% of the patients and corresponded to Hev b 6.03 as well as other proteins. A not yet characterized doublet of acidic proteins with molecular masses of 43 and 94 kD was recognized by 20.4% of the sera. Only 5.5% of the sera did not recognize any of these 4 major allergens. Hev b 1 is the main protein from the glove extract but was not constantly found in sap extracts. CONCLUSIONS: One-dimensional electrophoretic analysis of the allergen is usually not sufficient to characterize the individual specificity of the IgE response to latex allergens. Latex-glove proteins which are allergens can be absent from the sap extracts and the sensitization to these allergens could be underestimated. Individual 2-D analysis of the sensitization to latex allergens is useful to define the best allergen mixture required for diagnosis and needed for individual therapy monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and ImmunologySame topicContact Dermatitis and AllergiesFrench-language works237,207