The New Soehendra Stent Retriever Makes Stent Exchange Much Easier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biliary stent exchange is usually performed in two steps: 1) removal of the occluded stent using either a snare or a rat-tooth forceps, and 2) placement of a new biliary stent. However, in cases of complicated strictures, recannulation of the stricture may be difficult or even impossible. The Soehendra stent retriever was designed to avoid such problems and guarantee stent replacement. Those using this device for replacing on occluded stent may, however, encounter difficulties in inserting the guide wire into the stent and advancing the retriever over the guide wire to engage the distal end of the stent. This drawback has recently been eliminated by modifying the tip of the retriever (Figures [ 1 ] and [ 2 ].) Figure 1 A 2.5 cm long 5-French curved catheter is mounted on the tip of the retriever, to facilitate the engagement of the retriever with the distal end of the stent and thereby the insertion of the guide wire into the stent. Figure 2 Endoscopic view showing the coupling of the retriever with the distal end of the occluded stent. The guide wire is then advanced. In order to replace an occluded 10-French or 11.5-French plastic stent, the Soehendra stent retriever can now be inserted together with a 400-cm 0.035-inch Teflon-coated guide wire or other hydrophilic wire. The addition of a curved plastic tip significantly facilitates the cannulation of the occluded stent and the insertion of the guide wire (SSR-10-T or SSR-11.5-T; Wilson-Cook, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA). The retriever can then easily be coupled and screwed into the distal end of the stent. The stent is withdrawn leaving the guide wire in place, ensuring that a new stent can be placed. Plastic stents made of polyethylene tend to become softer after a few months, and so the tip of the retriever may not anchor properly in the distal end of the stent, causing failure of stent retrieval. In such cases, an 11.5-French retriever should be used for removal of a 10-French polyethylene stent. So far, we have used the modified stent retriever to replace occluded biliary stent in 20 procedures. In all cases, the procedure was successful and uneventful. The use of the new retriever for replacing 10-French or 11.5-French plastic stents has become an easy procedure, even for trainees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".