MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983134537 · doi:10.1055/s-2003-36405

The New Soehendra Stent Retriever Makes Stent Exchange Much Easier

2003· article· en· W1983134537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Uwe Seitz, Stefan Seewald, Xin He, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Frank Thonke, N. Soehendra

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineForcepsStentLabrador RetrieverBiliary stentSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biliary stent exchange is usually performed in two steps: 1) removal of the occluded stent using either a snare or a rat-tooth forceps, and 2) placement of a new biliary stent. However, in cases of complicated strictures, recannulation of the stricture may be difficult or even impossible. The Soehendra stent retriever was designed to avoid such problems and guarantee stent replacement. Those using this device for replacing on occluded stent may, however, encounter difficulties in inserting the guide wire into the stent and advancing the retriever over the guide wire to engage the distal end of the stent. This drawback has recently been eliminated by modifying the tip of the retriever (Figures [ 1 ] and [ 2 ].) Figure 1 A 2.5 cm long 5-French curved catheter is mounted on the tip of the retriever, to facilitate the engagement of the retriever with the distal end of the stent and thereby the insertion of the guide wire into the stent. Figure 2 Endoscopic view showing the coupling of the retriever with the distal end of the occluded stent. The guide wire is then advanced. In order to replace an occluded 10-French or 11.5-French plastic stent, the Soehendra stent retriever can now be inserted together with a 400-cm 0.035-inch Teflon-coated guide wire or other hydrophilic wire. The addition of a curved plastic tip significantly facilitates the cannulation of the occluded stent and the insertion of the guide wire (SSR-10-T or SSR-11.5-T; Wilson-Cook, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA). The retriever can then easily be coupled and screwed into the distal end of the stent. The stent is withdrawn leaving the guide wire in place, ensuring that a new stent can be placed. Plastic stents made of polyethylene tend to become softer after a few months, and so the tip of the retriever may not anchor properly in the distal end of the stent, causing failure of stent retrieval. In such cases, an 11.5-French retriever should be used for removal of a 10-French polyethylene stent. So far, we have used the modified stent retriever to replace occluded biliary stent in 20 procedures. In all cases, the procedure was successful and uneventful. The use of the new retriever for replacing 10-French or 11.5-French plastic stents has become an easy procedure, even for trainees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207