MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983180509 · doi:10.1139/o04-055

Complex expression pattern of the Barth syndrome gene product tafazzin in human cell lines and murine tissues

2004· article· en· W1983180509 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Biao Lü, Marguerite R. Kelher, Douglas P. Lee, Tal M. Lewin, Rosalind Coleman, Patrick C. Choy, Grant M. Hatch

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetYale UniversityBarth Syndrome Foundation
KeywordsBiologyMolecular biologyExonAlternative splicingCardiolipinComplementary DNAGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tafazzins, a group of proteins that are defective in patients with Barth syndrome, are produced by alternate splicing of the gene G4.5 or TAZ. RT-PCR and transcription-coupled in vitro translation analysis were undertaken to determine the expression of alternatively spliced TAZ mRNA in mouse tissues and human cell lines. Only two tafazzin transcripts, both lacking exon 5, were expressed in murine tissues, whereas four tafazzin transcripts, all lacking exon 5, were observed in human umbilical vein vascular endothelial cells and U937 human monoblasts indicating a species-specific difference in the expression of TAZ mRNAs in mouse and humans. Only TAZ lacking exon 5 was expressed in murine heart. Differentiation of U937 human monoblasts into macrophages did not alter expression of the tafazzin transcripts indicating that TAZ expression is independent of monocyte differentiation. Cloning and in vitro expression of both murine and human tafazzin cDNA revealed two prominent protein bands that corresponded to the expected sizes of alternative translation. A novel fifth motif, identified as critical for the glycerolphosphate acyltransferase family, was observed in human tafazzin. The presence of a mutation in this region in Barth syndrome patients indicates that this motif is essential for tafazzin function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207