Quantitative study, identification and antibiotics sensitivity of someVibrionaceae associated to a marine fish hatchery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study characterises the bacteria associated with a marine hatchery in Tunisian coastal marine waters. Presumptive vibrios (TCBS agar) and heterotrophic aerobic microflora (CFU) were studied at different stages within the hatchery: seawater, batches of algal cultures, rotifers and Artemia culture tanks. The bacterial strains were isolated on TCBS Agar plates and described using different bacteriological tests (standardised micromethods “API 20 E Strips”, exoenzymes production, growth at different temperatures, pH and salinity, vibriostatic agent O/129 and antibiotics susceptibility). Two dominant genera of bacteria were found ( Vibrio and Aeromonas ) associated with some strains of the Pseudomonadaceae family. Vibrio alginolyticus was the dominant bacteria (75% of total isolates) found in rotifers ( Brachionus plicatilis ) and Artemia cultures ( Artemia salina ). In larvae rearing tanks, an increase of Vibrionaceae was noted after larvae were fed with Artemia . Most of the studied bacteria used the skin mucus of Sparus aurata larvae as their sole source of carbon. All the V. alginolyticus strains were β-haemolytic, hydrolyse the DNA and were susceptible to several tested antibiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".