Fluorescent in situ hybridization and characterization of the <i>Sal</i>I family of satellite repeats in the <i>Haliotis</i> L. species (abalone) of the Northeast Pacific
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The SalI satellite repeat previously identified in Haliotis L. (abalone) was thought to be present in H. rufescens and absent in H. fulgens. However, we show here that SalI is also found in H. fulgens and is not useful for screening hybrid individuals bred in aquaculture or occurring naturally in the wild. SalI is a family of predominantly subtelomeric tandemly repeated sequences, and sequenced clones revealed clustering to species and little intraspecific variation. Analysis of SalI sequence divergence between Haliotis species of the Northeast Pacific revealed that evolutionary distances correlate well with bathymetric and latitudinal species distributions. Analysis of the structure of the tandem repeats revealed two regions of high sequence conservation that may contain conserved transcription factor binding sites, a surprise for an apparently "non-coding" tandem repeat. We speculate that these regions might be involved in heterochromatin silencing, perhaps mediated via transcriptional activity and RNA interference. The repeats show substantial differences in their chromosomal distributions, even between individuals of the same species, indicating a dynamic organization of repeats, perhaps mediated via sequence homogenization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".