Primary Sensory Neuron Addition in the Adult Rat Trigeminal Ganglion: Evidence for Neural Crest Glio-Neuronal Precursor Maturation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is debated whether primary sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglia increase the number in adult animals and, if so, whether the increase is attributable to postnatal neurogenesis or maturation of dormant, postmitotic precursors. Similar studies are lacking in the trigeminal ganglion (TG). Here we demonstrate by stereological methods that the number of neurons in the TG of adult male rats nearly doubles between the third and eighth months of age. The increase is mainly attributable to the addition of small, B-type neurons, with a smaller contribution of large, A-neurons. We looked for possible proliferative or maturation mechanisms that could explain this dramatic postnatal expansion in neuron number, using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling, immunocytochemistry for neural precursor cell antigens, retrograde tracing identification of peripherally projecting neurons, and in vitro isolation of precursor cells from adult TG explant cultures. Cell proliferation identified months after an extended BrdU administration was sparse and essentially corresponded to glial cells. No BrdU-labeled cell took up the peripherally injected tracer, and only a negligible number coexpressed BrdU and the pan-neuronal tracer neuron-specific enolase. In contrast, a population of cells not recognizable as mature neurons in the TG and neighboring nerve expressed neuronal precursor antigens, and neural crest glioneuronal precursor cells were successfully isolated from adult TG explants. Our data suggest that a protracted maturation process persists in the TG that can be responsible for the neuronal addition found in the adult rat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".