Combined tight-binding/DFT investigation of the electronic structure of triimine-platinum(II)/TCNQ extended stacks<sup>,</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
. The [Pt(tbtrpy)(X)][TCNQ] (X = OH or SH) complexes form sandwich stacks with nitrile acceptors leading to extended-chain supramolecular assemblies, tbtrpy = 4,4′,4″-tert-Bu 3 -2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine. Calculations with the extended Hückel tight-binding (EHTB) method are performed upon crystalline {[Pt (tbtrpy)(X)][TCNQ]} ∞ species to analyze their electronic structure and consequent properties, TCNQ = 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane. The donor/acceptor extended chains in the solid state are predicted to exhibit metallic behavior with a large contribution from π and π* bands of TCNQ to the valence and conduction bands, respectively. Moreover, the valence band moves upward (i.e., to a less negative energy) for X = SH as compared to X = OH. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that this is due to large thiolate character in the HOMO of the square-planar donor complex, which also supports the experimental assignment of the electronic absorption bands and redox potentials. Calculations of infrared (ν CN bands of TCNQ) and structural (CC bond lengths within TCNQ) data explain the metallic behavior of the stacks in terms of charge delocalization, leading to fractionally-charged species of the form [Pt(tbtrpy)X] (1+δ)+ [TCNQ] (1+δ)- with δ > 0 and a greater δ value for X = SH vs OH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".