Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Vitamin D-Resistant Rickets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A case report of cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in a patient with vitamin D-resistant rickets is presented together with a review of literature. OBJECTIVE: To report the diagnosis of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in a white woman with vitamin D-resistant rickets. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The association between ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and untreated vitamin D-resistant rickets has been reported in Japan, but infrequently in white populations. In whites, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament is closely associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. A clear association between ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and vitamin D-resistant rickets in white populations has not yet been established. METHODS: The medical record and imaging studies of a patient treated at the authors' institution for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the setting of treated vitamin D-resistant rickets were reviewed. A Medline search of the medical literature between 1966-1999 was performed to identify pertinent studies and similar case reports. RESULTS: The occurrence of spinal stenosis in untreated adults with vitamin D-resistant rickets has been reported in all regions of the spine in Japanese patients. The association between ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and untreated vitamin D-resistant rickets was first reported in Japan, where ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament is endemic. This association may be incidental, because reports on ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in whites are not as frequent as in Japanese, reflecting the higher prevalence of this condition in Japan. CONCLUSION: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament associated with deranged calcium or phosphate metabolism may be different pathologic entities sharing a common outcome. Adequate treatment of vitamin D-resistant rickets may not always prevent or reverse ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".