Gesellschaft und Diplomatie im transatlantischen Kontext: Festschrift fur Reinhard R. Doerries zum 65. Geburtstag (Society and Diplomacy in Transatlantic Context: A Festschrift for Reinhard R. Doerries on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reinhard R. Doerries is no ordinary Ordinarius. Born into a German academic family, he spent much of his youth on a midwestern farm and at Concordia College, went on to earn graduate degrees in art history, modern history, and business administration in the United States, Germany, and France, and to build a career in international banking and business. Since turning to research and teaching, he has made significant contributions in international relations, the acculturation of overseas immigrants, and, perhaps his most enduring concern, the operation and influence of national intelligence services. This festschrift in his honor is, for that reason, extraordinary in its diversity. With twenty-eight essays—nine in English—divided into ten thematic sections, it contains something for almost everyone. Social and cultural historians can find articles on the German-language press in Philadelphia during the American Revolution and on the anti-slavery character of that press in antebellum New Orleans. There is a comparison of notions of femininity in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century America and Germany, an examination of Canadian immigration policies, and another of the experiences of two women immigrants, one German and one Irish, in Canada in the 1920s and 1930s. There are essays on the efforts of Heinz Kloss to raise the national consciousness of German Americans during the Third Reich, on minority language policies in Canada and Switzerland, and, for good measure, on the American regionalist painters of the 1930s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".