Mechanistic Insight into Domain Formation and Growth in a Phase-Separated Langmuir−Blodgett Monolayer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism of the formation and growth of phase-separated domains in mixed arachidic acid (C19H39COOH) (AA) and perfluorotetradecanoic acid (C13F27COOH) (PA) monolayer films was investigated through a combination of surface pressure-area isotherm measurements and atomic force microscope (AFM) imaging. In the mixed AA-PA monolayer system, distinct discontinuous domains consisting primarily of AA form spontaneously in a surrounding continuous matrix enriched in PA. By varying the monolayer deposition conditions, including temperature, surface pressure, and the mechanical agitation of sample solutions, it was determined that phase-separated nuclei are formed initially in the bulk sample solution and further growth of domains proceeds on the subphase surface via an Ostwald ripening process involving the diffusion of AA from the matrix to the discontinuous domains. In addition, selective dissolution of the arachidic acid followed by in situ AFM imaging has allowed the visualization of the fusion of AA to the phase-separated domains and has highlighted some unusual pattern formation that occurs at low subphase temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".