Emitting-State Displacements in Ligand-Centered Vibrational Modes in the <i>trans-</i>[OsO<sub>2</sub>(NCS)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2</sup><sup>-</sup> Complex Determined from Near-Infrared Luminescence Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low-temperature luminescence spectra from three salts of the trans-[OsO(2)(NCS)(4)](2-) complex exhibit highly resolved vibronic structure in both metal-ligand high-frequency O=Os=O (885 cm(-1)) and lower-frequency Os-N(CS) (255 cm(-1)) symmetric stretching modes as well as in a ligand-centered CS stretching mode (858 cm(-1)). Band maxima range from 10000 to 12000 cm(-1), and spectra contain irregular frequency intervals that correspond to transitions from more than one origin and phonon sidebands. Experimental band shapes are distinctly different for all three compounds and are calculated assuming harmonic potential energy surfaces for both the ground and emitting states. Normal-coordinate offsets along all displaced vibrational modes are determined and compared for the three compounds. The analyses reveal emitting-state displacement of high-frequency ligand-centered (CS) and metal-ligand (O=Os=O) symmetric stretching modes, leading to observed high-frequency intervals (855-880 cm(-1)) that do not match any frequencies determined from ground-state Raman spectra. The values for the high-frequency normal-coordinate offsets, DeltaQ(O=Os=O) and DeltaQ(CS), were found to be on the order of 0.06 A. Offsets along the 255 cm(-1) Os-N mode varied noticeably between the three compounds and were largest for the compound with the largest value of DeltaQ(CS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".