The Spectrum of Endemic Renal Tubular Acidosis in the Northeast of Thailand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously reported a high prevalence of endemic renal tubular acidosis (EnRTA) in the northeast of Thailand, and our subsequent studies provided evidence that K deficiency exists in the same region. Since tubulointerstitial damage is associated with K deficiency, we postulate that this might be implicated in the pathogenesis of EnRTA and, if so, that a spectrum of tubulointerstitial abnormalities can be anticipated. In this study we evaluated renal acidification ability in 4 patients and in 11 of their relatives. We used a 3-day acid load (NH4Cl 0.1 g/kg/day) followed by 20 mg oral furosemide and monitored the maximal renal concentrating ability using water deprivation and intranasal 1-deamino-D-arginine vasopressin. The results showed that the subjects could be divided into three groups; normal relatives of the patients, those with suspected renal tubular acidosis, and patients with overt EnRTA who had chronic metabolic acidosis and a low rate of excretion of NH4+. The rate of excretion of K was very low (20 +/- 4 mmol/day) in patients with EnRTA and in their relatives with suspected EnRTA. The transtubular K concentration gradient was also very low in their relatives, especially in patients with suspected EnRTA (2.8 +/- 0.2). With a 3-day NH4Cl load, the rate of excretion of NH4+ was very low in patients with EnRTA (32 +/- 9 mmol/day), and the relatives with suspected EnRTA also had a decreased capacity to excrete NH+4 (50 +/- 14 mmol/day). In contrast, the normal relatives excreted 92 +/- 12 mmol of NH+4/day. The patients with EnRTA could lower their urine pH to less than 5.5 after the acid loading (6.2 +/- 0.3). After furosemide (20 mg), the NH4+ excretion in the patients with EnRTA was lower than in the normal relatives. Moreover, the minimum urine pH in patients with EnRTA did not fall (6.1 +/- 0.2), but there was a fall to 4.8 +/- 0.1 in the patients with suspected EnRTA after furosemide treatment. In conclusion, there was a spectrum of tubulointerstitial abnormalities ranging from suspected to overt distal RTA in a geographic area known to have a high prevalence of K deficiency. K deficiency might be the important pathogenetic factor of EnRTA in the northeast of Thailand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".