Combined Glenoid Anteversion Osteotomy and Tendon Transfers for Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the setting of severe glenohumeral dysplasia secondary to brachial plexus birth palsy, external rotation osteotomy of the humerus has traditionally been used to transpose the existing arc of shoulder motion to a more functional position. Here we introduce a surgical alternative, the aim of which is to gain stable reduction of the shoulder and restore active external rotation. METHODS: All patients with brachial plexus birth palsy and Waters type-III, IV, or V glenohumeral dysplasia who underwent glenoid anteversion osteotomy combined with tendon transfers between 2006 and 2009 were identified. The Mallet score, Active Movement Scale, and active and passive ranges of motion were used to assess functional outcomes. Axial imaging was used to measure glenoid version, the degree of subluxation, and the Waters type. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a median age of 6.8 years (range, 2.1 to 16.2 years) were followed for a mean of twenty months (range, twelve to twenty-nine months). On average, passive external rotation with the shoulder in neutral increased by 43° (95% confidence interval [CI], 26° to 60°), passive internal rotation decreased by 22° (95% CI, 12° to 31°), active external rotation with the shoulder in neutral increased by 82° (95% CI, 66° to 98°), and active internal rotation decreased by 26° (95% CI, 14° to 38°). The aggregate Mallet score improved by a mean of 4.0 points (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.9). Glenoid retroversion improved by a mean of 26° (95% CI, 20° to 32°). The percentage of the humeral head anterior to the midscapular line improved by a mean of 35% (95% CI, 30% to 40%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe glenohumeral dysplasia, glenoid realignment osteotomy in conjunction with soft-tissue rebalancing permits maintenance of joint reduction and functional improvement in the short term. In our view, external rotation osteotomy of the humerus is no longer the only surgical option for these cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".